Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3502/2017bail granted

Anuj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-27Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3502 of 2017 (2) dt.27-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3502 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -111 Year- 2016 Thana -HALSI District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Anuj Kumar, Son of Krishan Pandit, Resident of Village- Suryamath Tola, Behind R.Lal College, Ward No.21, P.S.- Kabaiya, District- Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 111 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)A, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, one country made pistol, one live .315 cartridge and cash of Rs. 1,00,000/-, as per seizure list, were recovered from possession of the petitioner.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, another case arising out of same occurrence has been registered wherein the petitioner has been named as one of the accused, the petitioner is in custody since 30.08.2016 and has been sufficiently penalized. Learned APP opposes the prayer of bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3502 of 2017 (2) dt.27-02-2017 In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering the custody of the petitioner, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Halsi P.S. Case No. 111 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T