Sajan Kumar Singh @ Sajan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54312 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2020 Thana- SUPPI District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Sajan Kumar Singh @ Sajan Singh S/O Brijkishor Singh @ Vrijkishor Singh Resident Of Village- Gamhariya, P.S.- Suppi, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Akbar Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 30 of 2020 registered under Sections 363, 366 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and after charge sheet, cognizance has been taken under Sections 363, 366(A) and 34 of IPC and Section 8 of POCSO Act.

It is a case of abduction of the informant's daughter while she was returning from her coaching then petitioner along with co-accused forcefully sat her on Bolero. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this present case due to village politics. When victim recovered, she stated in her statement

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54312 of 2022(2) dt.17-01-2023 2/2 recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. which is mentioned in impugned order and from impugned order it is apparent that she voluntarily entered into marriage with the petitioner. It is further submitted that good sense has been prevailed between the parties and in this respect, compromise petition has brought on record as Annexure-2. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has got no criminal antecedents. He is languishing in judicial custody since 26.06.2022. The application for bail is vehemently opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Suppi P.S. Case No. 30 of 2020 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, VI-cum Special Judge (POCSO Act), Sitamarhi. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) shubham/- U T