Patna High CourtCR. WJC/562/2016dismissed

Meena Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-07-04The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.562 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Meena Devi Wife of Pradeep Singh Resident of quarter No. H- 1/8 Railway Colony, Besides Power House, Hajipur , Police Station- Town Hajipur, District Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Home Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Inspector General of Police, Patna Division Patna

6. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Division, Patna.

7. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna

8. The City Superintendent of Police, Patna.

9. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sadar Patna.

10. The Superintendent of Police, Vaishali Hajipur.

11. The Station House Officer, Kadamkuan, Police Station, Patna.

12. Mr. Anil Kumar Singh I.O. Kadamkuan, PS Case No. 174/ 2016 .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Rajpati, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh, GA-7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 04-07-2016 Heard Mr.

Pramod Rajpati, learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the petitioner, and Mr. Subhash Prasad Singh, learned Government Advocate No.7, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.

In view of the fact that in Kadamkuan Police Station Case No.174 of 2016, the petitioner's son, namely, Kundan Kumar, has been arrested as an accused, and the contention of the petitioner is that her son is innocent and by making the present

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.562 of 2016 (2) dt.04-07-2016 2/2 application, under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner alleges unfair investigation and seeks direction for investigation by the Central Bureau of Investigation or Central Investigation Department, which is wholly misconceived in law inasmuch as the petitioner's son, who is major, has to agitate himself if the investigation of the case is improper or manipulated. The petitioner, thus, having no cause of action, cannot maintain this writ petition and this writ petition stands dismissed. Mkr./- (I.A. Ansari, ACJ.) U T