← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./27744/2016bail granted

Chhotu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-27Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27744 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -130 Year- 2016 Thana -KAJI MUHAMMADPUR District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Chhotu Kumar, Son of Raju Mahto, Resident of Village- Majhouliya road, near Gumati no. 5, P.S.- Kazimohammadpur, District Muzaffarpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Bela Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Nazir Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kazimohammadpur P.S. Case No.130 of 2016 for allegedly having committed the offence under Sections 147, 148, 323, 354, 376, 511, 380, 457 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the entire allegation is false and fabricated and has been initiated only because there is a boundary dispute between the parties. The story regarding the petitioner taking the advantage of her loneliness is also frivolous and concocted and further the allegation that the petitioner had attacked the informant with

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27744 of 2016 (2) dt.27-09-2016 2/2 Danda and brutally assaulted her has been proved false as there is no injury report, rather the Primary Health Centre at Muzaffarpur which had diagnosed the injured, namely, Vittu Kumar, shows that he was treated for gastric disorder and not on account of any injury.

Considering the nature of allegations made and that the prosecution story stands belied by the medical report and also that the petitioner has no criminal antecedents, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Cum-SubJudge 1st, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Kazimohammadpur P.S. Case No.130 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T