Mahanth Kaushal Kishore Das And ANR v. The Bihar State Hindu Religious Trust Board And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10098 of 2013 ====================================================== Mahanth Kaushal Kishore Das, Chela Of Late 108 Rajeshwar Das Janki Janmbhumi Punaura Dham, P.S. And District - Sitamarhi

2. Deity Of Ramjanki Installed In Ramjanki Mandir Punaura At Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The Bihar State Hindu Religious Trust Board, Vidypati Marg, Patna Through Its Adhyaksh

2. The Adhyaksh, Bihar State Hindu Religious Trust Board, Patna, Respondents Ist Party

3. Shri Mihir Kumar Singh s/o not known to the petitioners, at Present Posted As Secretary, Tourism Department, Government Of Bihar, Patna - Cum - Adhyaksh,

4. Shri Arun Bhushan Prasad s/o not known to the petitioners ( Retired ) Secretary, Flat No.202 Shobha Apartment, Boring Road, Patna

5. Shri Sajjan Hisaria s/o not known to the petitioners, Old Exchange Road, Sitamarhi ( Treasurer)

6. Shri Ramnath Mahto s/o not known to the petitioners, Resident Of Village and P.O. Punaura, Sitamarhi - Member,

7. Dr. T.N. Singh, Rajopatti, s/o not known to the petitioners, Sitamarhi - Member

8. Shri Arbind Kumar Singh s/o not known to the petitioners, Village and P.O. Punaura, District Sitamarhi - Member, Sl. Nos. 3 to 8 are office bearers and members of the alleged Trust Committee Of Shri Ramjanki Janmbhumi Punaura Dham, District - Sitamarhi, .... .... Respondents 2nd Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : M/s Yogendra Mishra and Arvind Kumar Jha, Advocates For the Respondents : Mr. Sekhar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 28-08-2015 In view of the stand of the respondent-Bihar State Hindu Religious Trust Board(hereinafter to be referred to as "the Board") in paragraphs 9 to 12 of the counter affidavit filed by it that the committee under challenge already stood terminated by efflux of time, i.e., on 11.11.2013, and consequently, the modification

Patna High Court CWJC No.10098 of 2013 (5) dt.28-08-2015 notification dated 01.02.2013 contained in Annexure 9 has also lost its significance and force which has alsolapsed together with further statement that the petitioner, who is a Mahanth of the trust in question, is continuing as such and the Board has no grievance against him, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press this application.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed as not pressed. (Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U