Umesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3542 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -173 Year- 2015 Thana -GURUA District- GAYA ======================================================

1. Umesh Yadav, Son of Deo Ratan Yadav, Resident of Village- Akothra, Police Station- Gurua, District- Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Tewary, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 08-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew the prayer of bail, which was earlier rejected vide order dated 29.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. 4614 of 2016, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 02.10.2015, direction was given to conclude the trial within a period of nine months, but the direction has not been concluded and now in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded as up till now only one prosecution witness has been examined.

The learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer of bail by submitting that petitioner has assaulted the father of the informant with tangi causing his death.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3542 of 2017 (2) dt.08-02-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer of the bail, again prayer of the bail of the petitioner stands rejected. However, the learned trail Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within a period of six months taking same on priority basis, failing which if the petitioner at no fault, may be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T