Patna High CourtCWJC/10601/2016dismissed

Vikash Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

2017-06-20Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10601 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Vikash Kumar son of Late Babu Lal Prasad resident of Pashchami Ram Krishna Nagar, Jyotish Babu Road, Amardeep Nagar, Dhelwa Police Station Ram Krishna Nagar, District Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Post, Dak Bhawan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi 1100011.

2. The Chief Post Master General Bihar Circle Patna - 800001.

3. The Director, Postal Services Office of the Chief Post Master General, Bihar Circle, Patna - 800001.

4. The Chief Post Master, Patna G P O Patna - 800001.

5. The Manager C P C (PIL) Office of the Chief Post Master GPO, Patna - 800001.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar, Mr. A.K. Pandey For the Union of India : Mr. Ravinder Kumar Sharma, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 20-06-2017 Learned counsel for the Union of India has produced a letter dated 28.4.2017 issued by the Dy. Divisional Manager (PLI, Patna to the Assistant Director (LC), Chief Postmaster General, Patna wherein it has been mentioned that representation of the petitioner (Vikash Kumar) has been reexamined by the competent authority and admitted the claim. Accordingly a letter has been issued to the claimant as well as to CPC Patna G.P.O vide office letter of even no. dated 27.4.2017 for issuance of sanction memo for taking payment by the claimant. A copy of the same is enclosed for

Patna High Court CWJC No.10601 of 2016 (3) dt.20-06-2017 needful. Let it be kept on record.

Learned counsel for the Union of India submits that in such view of the matter, grievance of the petitioner has been redressed and in such view of the matter, this writ petition has been rendered infructuous.

Accordingly this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U