← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6689/2018bail granted

Lalita Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-02-08Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6689 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -244 Year- 2017 Thana -UDWANTNAGAR District- BHOJPUR ======================================================

1. Lalita Devi, wife of Teju Singh,

2. Rajkali Devi, wife of Hare Ram Singh, both resident of village- Milki Tola, P.S. Udwant Nagar, District- Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ramanuj Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 08-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No.244 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B, 201/34 Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioners are motherin-law and sister-in-law of the deceased. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6689 of 2018 (2) dt.08-02-2018 2/2 Case No.244 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T