← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./21598/2015rejected

Bal Krishna Kumar @ Bal Krishna Yadav And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2016-08-17Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21598 of 2015 (8) dt.17-08-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.21598 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -669 Year- 2014 Thana -MADHEPURA COMPALINT CASE DistrictMADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Bal Krishna Kumar alias Bal Krishna Yadav. Son of Mishri Lal Yadav.

2. Manoj Yadav Son of Mishri Lal Yadav.

3. Manju Devi Wife of Manoj Yadav.

4. Fulia Devi, Wife of Mishri Lal Yadav.

All resident of village- Rupauli, Police Station- Gamharia, DistrictMadhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .

2. Sanju Devi W/o Bal Krishna Kumar @ Bal Krishna Yadav D/O Gopal Yadav, Village-Jogbani, P.O.-Bhawanipur, P.S.-Gamharia, DistrictMadhepura.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kr.Singh 1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 17-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2.

The opposite party No. 2 is present in Court today along with a baby girl. However, the petitioner has failed to appear and he has also not honoured his earlier commitment to pay the petitioner rupees two thousand per month for her sustenance. Today also, a prayer has been made on his behalf for an adjournment. The Court takes serious note of the conduct of the petitioner. It appears that he is absolutely unrepentant and his submission that he will keep the girl with all honour and dignity is nothing, but an eye-wash.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21598 of 2015 (8) dt.17-08-2016 Having heard the parties and on consideration of all facts and circumstances including the past conduct of the petitioner, the order dated 23.09.2015 granting interim protection in connection with Complaint Case No. 669 of 2014 stands withdrawn. Prayer for anticipatory bail is, thus, rejected.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Saif/- U T