Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Soni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64817 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2020 Thana- KARAKAT District- Rohtas ====================================================== RAVI KUMAR @ RAVI KUMAR SONI Son of Manoj Seth @ Manoj Prasad Soni @ Manoj Kumar Soni Resident of Village - Gorari, P.S.- Karakat, District - Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 01-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks. In the eventuality of nonremoval of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 363, 376D, 341, 342, 328 & 120B of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4/6 of the POCSO Act.

This is the second attempt of the petitioner to approach before this Court for bail. Earlier, vide order dated 15.09.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. No.43998 of 2021, the prayer for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64817 of 2021(2) dt.01-12-2021 2/3 bail of the petitioner was rejected with a liberty to renew his prayer after framing of charge.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that charge has been framed on 05.10.2021.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with POCSO Case No.20 of 2020 (Karakat P.S. Case No.69 of 2020), subject to the following conditions :

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded and make himself available and when

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64817 of 2021(2) dt.01-12-2021 3/3 so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(5) The petitioner will mark his attendance in the local police station in first week of every month till conclusion of trial, failing which the prosecution will be at liberty to move cancellation of his bail bond.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T