Prakash Ravidas v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12686 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -36 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA PS District- JAMUI ====================================================== Prakash Ravidas, Son of Late Ghutak Ravidas, resident of VillageTeliadih, P.S.- Jhajha, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prakash Mahto For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application has been filed in connection with Jamui Mahila P.S.Case No.36 of 2016 for the offence under Sections 323, 341, 498A and 494 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that as the O.P. no.2 has herself left the house and she is not ready to come and live with him. The petitioner is a patient of heart. He is in custody for about three months.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12686 of 2017 (3) dt.28-03-2017 2/2 satisfaction of S.D.J.M.-II, Jamui in connection with Jamui Mahila P.S.Case No.36 of 2016.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T