Deepak Mandal @ Guddu Mandal v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.11239 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2016 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar ====================================================== Deepak Mandal @ Guddu Mandal, Son of Late Raghunath Mandal, Resident of Mohalla- Sharif Ganj, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Soni Devi, Wife of Deepak Mandal, Resident of Mohalla- Sharifganj, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Katihar, at present resident of Buddhuchak, P.S.- Muffasil, district- Katihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Musowir For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. SHANTANU KUMAR ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case due to petty family dispute. The case is triable by the Magistrate. The
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11239 of 2018(2) dt.26-02-2018 2/2 petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Katihar in connection with C.A. case No.376 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T