Patna High CourtL.P.A/1103/2016dismissed

Shashi Bhushan Yadav v. The Union Of India And ORS

2017-08-22The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.1103 of 2016 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20112 of 2014 =========================================================== Shashi Bhushan Yadav Son of Shiv Kumar Yadav Resident of Village - Majhaura, Police Station - Raj Nagar, District - Madhubani. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through Addl. Secretary, Petroleum and Natural Gas Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

2. The Additional Secretary, Petroleum and Natural Gas Department, Govt. of India, New Delhi.

3. The Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through its Managing Director, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg Bandra (East) Mumbai, 400051.

4. The Managing Director, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through its Managing Director, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg Bandra (East) Mumbai, 400051.

5. The District Magistrate (L.P.G. - S), Bhagalpur, District - Bhagalpur.

6. The Area Manager Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. (M.D.) Indian Area Office Begusarai, P.O. Barauni Oil Refinery, District - Begusarai (Bihar) - 851114.

7. The Central Vigilance, Vigilance Bhawan, Block of G.P.O. Complex INA, New Delhi - 110023.

8. Dy. General Manager (Vigilance) M/S Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Indian Oil Bhawan, Gariya Hat Road Dhakuria, Kolkata - 700068.

9. Smt. Rani Devi wife of Amar Nath Thakur resident of village Pachdahi, P.S. - Raj Nagar, District - Madhubani.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ram Narayan Mahto, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Kanak Verma, C.G.C =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 22-08-2017 Keeping in view the nature of dispute involved in the matter which is a dispute on factual aspects, the learned Writ Court has refused to exercise its extraordinary jurisdiction and has held that disputes of fact has to be resolved by taking recourse to the common

Patna High Court LPA No.1103 of 2016 dt.22-08-2017 2/2 law remedy.

In doing so, no error has been committed by the learned Writ Court warranting reconsideration.

The Letters Patent Appeal stands dismissed.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 24.08.2017 Transmission Date