Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2055 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12446 of 2009 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar, S/o Sri Nageshwar Singh, R/o Village- Settana, P.S.- Halsi, Dist- Lakhisarai, at present working as Science teacher in Rajo Singh Sharda Sanskrit Primary-cum-High School, Gagari at And P.O.- Gagari, DistSheikhpura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

Mr. R.K. Mahajan, the Secretary cum Commissioner, Human Resource Development, New Secretariat, Baily Road, Patna-1. 3.

Mr. Prakash Chandra Mishra, The Special Director/Deputy Director (In Charge, Sanskrit Education) New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna-1. 4.

Mr. Durgesh Kumar Roy, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board through the Chairman, East Boring Canal Road, Patna.

5.

Mr. Sakaldeo Singh, the Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shikha Board, East Boring Canal Road, Patna.

6.

The Union of India, Human Resources Development (Education) Department through Mr. Sri D.P. Tripathi, The Assistant Advisor (Sanskrit) New Delhi. 7.

Mr. Sri Binod Kumar, the Under Secretary Education Department, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna-1. 8.

Rastriya Sanskrit Sansthan (Manit Cishwavidyalaya) through Mr. Sri Ganga Nath Jha, The Director, 56, Industrial Area, Janakpuri, New Delhi-58. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. MD. Harun Quareshi, AC to SC-01 For Rashrtiya Sanskrit Sansthan: Mr. R.K. Priyadarshi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Considering the fact that the contempt application complaining breach of the same order passed on 8.12.2011 in C.W.J.C. No.16435 of 2009 has already been disposed of and the contempt proceedings dropped vide order dated 9.5.2016 passed in M.J.C. No.2324/2015, a fresh contempt application is not maintainable.

Patna High Court MJC No.2055 of 2016(4) dt.15-09-2017 2/2 The petitioner can avail of the liberty granted for raising a fresh claim taking recourse to such remedy as may be permissible under law, but after the aforesaid order passed on 9.5.2016 in M.J.C. No.2324 of 2015 a fresh contempt application is not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) K.C.Jha/- U