Sonu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64368 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-132 Year-2020 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== SONU SINGH Son of Pawan Singh @ Fukki Singh Resident of Village - Sadipur, P.s.- Buniyadganj, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanket For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Yogendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 132 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 336, 307, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per prosecution case, there is accusation against the petitioner to have stabbed the informant's son upon his chest and abdomen.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is in custody since 08.04.2021 and bears no criminal antecedent. He further submits that petitioner has committed no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64368 of 2021(5) dt.27-09-2022 2/2 offence and he has falsely been implicated in this case by the informant with oblique motive.

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner submitting that there is specific allegation of stabbing the informant's son against the petitioner and the same is corroborated by the injury report of victim.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner coupled with injury report as well as material available on record, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, the petitioner may renew prayer of bail after six months from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order to the court concerned, if there is no substantial progress in the proceeding of trial within the stipulated period. (Alok Kumar Pandey, J) shahzad/- U T