← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17899/2017bail granted

Amar Prasad @ Amar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-02Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17899 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -59 Year- 2017 Thana -SIWAN CITY District- SIWAN ====================================================== Amar Prasad @ Amar Kumar S/o Shyam Sundar Prasad, R/o Mohalla - Shukla Toli, P.S. Siwan Town, District - Siwan .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Meena Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Siwan Town P.S.Case No. 59 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399, 402/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1 b) a, 26 & 35 of the Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of two live cartridges of 12 bore from his possession. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he has falsely been implicated in this case and he has remained in custody for three months.

Heard learned APP also, who has opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17899 of 2017 (3) dt.02-05-2017 2/2 facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan, in connection with Siwan Town P.S.Case No. 59 of 2017, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U