Vinod Bhandari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57937 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2024 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Vinod Bhandari S/O Late Satyanarayan Bhandari R/O Village- Ijra (satghara), P.S- Rahika, Distt.- Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md Soban Asghar For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Fahimuddin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323,324, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he objected selling of liquor by the accused persons including the petitioner, when Deepak Bhandari threatened the informant at point of gun and Chandan started assaulting him with an iron rod while petitioner assaulted by a sharp edged weapon causing injury on head of the informant. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57937 of 2024(3) dt.26-09-2024 2/3 informant. It is further submitted that though it is alleged that informant objected the selling of liquor but then petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. It is also submitted that no doubt informant alleges that he was assaulted by a sharp edged weapon by the petitioner on his head causing injury on head but from perusal of the injury report (Annexure-2), it would manifest that the same does not record the nature of injury suffered.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rahiak P.S. Case No. 105 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

7.

However, the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the injury of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57937 of 2024(3) dt.26-09-2024 3/3 injured and in the event, it is found that he suffered grievous injury on head, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T