Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Bhandari v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57264 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2024 Thana- RAHIKA District- Madhubani ====================================================== Chandan Kumar @ Chandan Bhandari S/O Vinod Bhandari R/O Village- Ijra (Satghara), P.S- Rahika, Distt.- Madhubani.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md Soban Asghar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is a young boy aged about 24 years.
4. The informant alleges that he objected selling of liquor by the accused persons including the petitioner when Deepak Bhandari threatened the informant at point of gun and petitioner started assaulting him with an iron rod while Vinod Bhandari assaulted by a sharp edged weapon causing injury on the head of the informant.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57264 of 2024(2) dt.20-08-2024 2/2 petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that though it is alleged that informant objected the selling of liquor but then petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that if petitioner is sent to judicial custody in the nature of allegation as alleged, the entire career would be jeopardized and charges are bright that petitioner may come in contact with the hardened criminal.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with G.R. No. 1028 of 2024 arising out of Rahiak P.S. Case No. 105 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T