Arun Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50671 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2016 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== ARUN SINGH, (M), aged about 40 years, Son of Shri Rajendra Singh Resident of Village - Jamalabad, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 447, 323, 354, 307, 302, 504, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier, the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide Annexure-1, giving liberty to renew his prayer after one year in jail custody.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 31.01.2018, i.e, more than one year.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Sessions Trial No.641 of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50671 of 2019(2) dt.28-08-2019 2/2 2018 arising out of Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 229 of 2016 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T