Binod Mahto v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.15846 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1542 Year- 2006 Thana -PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPURNIA ======================================================

1. Binod Mahto Son of Late Akkal Mahto, Resident of Village- Barhara Kothi Bintoli, P.S.- Barhara, District- Purnea .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Dayamani Devi W/o Suresh Paswan Resident of Village- Barhara Kothi Bintoli, P.S.- Barhara, District- Purnea .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Harendra Prasad, APP 96 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-04-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

This is a petition for grant of regular bail for offence under Section 376(2)(g) of the Indian Penal Code. This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Allegation is based on complaint petition.

Considering the aforesaid fact, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sessions Trial No. 715 of 2007 arising out of Complaint Case No. 1542 of 2006) to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, I, Purnea, or successor Court subject to the conditions that both the bailors shall be residents of territorial jurisdiction of the Court below having immovable property and the petitioner shall fully

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15846 of 2017 (2) dt.04-04-2017 2/2 cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the Court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √