Rahul Kumar @ Rupesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57075 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-85 Year-2024 Thana- BUXAR MUFFSIL District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.
Rahul Kumar @ Rupesh Singh Sonof Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Singh R/V- Village- Boksa, P.S.- Buxar Muffasil, Distt.- Buxar 2.
Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Singh Son Of Late Bechan Singh R/VVillage- Boksa, P.S.- Buxar Muffasil, Distt.- Buxar 3.
Nirmala Devi Wife Of Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar Singh R/V- VillageBoksa, P.S.- Buxar Muffasil, Distt.- Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Umanath Mishra, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-09-2024 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with regard to petitioner Nos. 1 & 2.
2. Permission is granted.
3. The anticipatory bail application with regard to above named petitioner Nos. 1 & 2 is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Petitioner No. 3 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 354(a), 308, 504, 506, 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
5. As per prosecution case, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner assaulted informant and her daughters by means of bricks and iron rod.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57075 of 2024(2) dt.11-09-2024 2/2
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that specific accusation of assault is against co-accused Rahul Kumar @ Rupesh Singh and co-accused Vinod Singh @ Vinod Kumar. Allegation against the petitioner is general and omnibus. Petitioner is a lady and claims clean antecedent.
7. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
8. Considering the nature of accusation and clean antecedent, this anticipatory bail with regard to petitioner No. 3, namely, Nirmala Devi is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioner No. 3 in the event of her arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Buxar Muffasil P. S. Case No. 85 of 2024, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T