Patna High CourtCWJC/8264/2015disposed

Tarachand Poddar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-01-14Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8264 of 2015 =========================================================== Tarachand Poddar, Son of Late Deep Narayan Poddar, presently working as registered contractor in the Department of Building Construction, Government of Bihar, Patna and at present residing at Sheo Nagar, South Dariyapur, PoliceStation- Parsa Bazar in the town and district of Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Secretary, Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Chief Engineer (Electrical), Building Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.

5. The Superintending Engineer, (Electrical), Building Construction Department, Patna.

6. The Electrical Executive Engineer, the then Electrical Estimating Division No.1, presently renamed as Electrical Works Division No. 2, Patna, Building Construction Department, Patna.

7. The Electrical Executive Engineer, Electrical Works Division, Building Construction Department, Bhagalpur.

8. The Executive Engineer, Building Division, Building Construction Department, Banka.

9. The Treasury Officer, Vishweshraiya Bhawan Treasury, Bailey Road, Patna .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 14-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Pursuant to the order dated 05.01.2016, counter affidavit

Patna High Court CWJC No.8264 of 2015 dt.14-01-2016 2/2 on behalf of the respondent no. 2 and supplementary counter affidavit on behalf of respondents no. 4 to 7 have been filed showing that all the admitted dues of the petitioner have now been paid to him. The position is accepted by the learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid, writ petition stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) Sujit/- U