Mithilesh Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.314 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16881 of 2014 ====================================================== Mithilesh Kumar Chaudhary, Son of Late Narayan Choudhary, Residing at Rudrapur, P.S.- Andhrathari, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner.
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Sri R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development Department, Bihar, Patna.
2. Sri Lal Keshwar Prasad, the Chairman, Bihar School Examination Board (S.S.) Budh Marg, Patna.
3. Sri Nivas Chandra Tiwari, the Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board (S.S) Budh Marg, Patna.
4. Sunil Kumar, Joint Secretary (Establishment), Bihar School Examination Board (S.D.) Budd Marge, Patna.
5. Bipin Kumar Singh, Section Officer (Establishment) Bihar School Examination Board (S.S.) Budh Marg, Patna.
.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Purnendu Singh : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anujit Sinha, AC to SC 14 ======================================================
CORAM:
HONOURABLE MR.
JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
C.W.J.C. No. 16881 of 2014 was disposed of on 04.12.2014 with an observation that as the Board vide order dated 12.09.2014 had stayed the suspension, however, a liberty was granted to the petitioner to approach this Court, in case, he is aggrieved by any subsequent action. It is further observed that needless to state that the respondents would ensure regular payment of salary to the petitioner.
Patna High Court MJC No.314 of 2015 (3) dt.27-01-2016 2 / 2 A show-cause has been filed by opposite parties. In para 7 of the show-cause, it has been stated that the joining of the petitioner has already been accepted on 16.02.2015. In terms of the order passed in the writ application, the opposite parties would make payment in accordance with law. This contempt application stands disposed of. (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.) Uday/- U