Rajesh Sahi v. The Union Of India And ORS
Patna High Court CWJC No.2221 of 2014 dt.15-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2221 of 2014 =========================================================== Rajesh Sahi Son Of Sri Awdhesh Sahi Resident Of Village- Marri Dalip, P.O.- Gobindpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District- Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Petroleum And Natural Gas, A Wing Sastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Pd. Road, New Delhi-1.
2. The Joint Secretary, (Corporate Affairs), Ministry Of Petroleum And Natural Gas, A Wing Sastri Bhawan, Dr. Rajendra Pd. Road, New Delhi-1.
3. The Chairman Indian Oil Corporation Limited, New Delhi
4. The General Manager (Bihar), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Null 5th Floor, Loknayak Jaiprakash Bhawan, Dakbanglow Chowk, Patna
5. The Deputy General Manager, (Bihar), Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, 5th Floor, Loknayak Jaiprakash Bhawan, Dakbanglow Chowk, Patna
6. The Chief Area Manager (M.D.), Indane Area Office Patna, Null Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., 1st Floor, Sahi Bhawan Exibision Road, Patna
7. Mukesh Kumar Rai Son Of Sri Ram Pravesh Rai Resident Of Village+P.O.- Mirzapur, District- Gopalganj .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vitesh Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the respondent no 1. : Mrs. Kanak Verma, CGC For the Respondent/s 2-6 : Mr. Anil Sinha, Adv. Mr. Abhimanyu Deo, Adv.
Mr. Amlesh Kumar Verma, Adv.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 15-12-2015
1. Heard the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for restraining the respondent corporation from issuing Letter of Intent to the respondent no. 7 pursuant to the draw in respect of item no. 161, said to be collusive.
3. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the draw in
Patna High Court CWJC No.2221 of 2014 dt.15-12-2015 question has at the stage managed in favour of respondent no. 7 in connivance with the officials of the respondent. It is further stated that the petitioner has filed several representations which is annexed at Annexure 5 series but to no avail.
4. Having heard the parties, the writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the respondent no. 5 for redressal of his grievance. In case such representation is filed within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law expeditiously, granting an opportunity to the petitioner of being heard. (Vikash Jain, J) Prakash/- U