Kiran Kumari v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11958 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.11958 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2017 Thana -BARH District- PATNA ====================================================== Kiran Kumari, daughter of Ramakant Yadav, resident of Village Harauli, P.S. Barh, District Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Premchandra Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 27-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 363, 366 of the Indian Penal Code and later on Sections 304(B0 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code was added.
It has been alleged that victim was married to Dharmendra Prasad Yadav and when the informant tried to contact with his daughter but he could not contact with his daughter then he went to the police station and thereafter he went to her Sasural. She was traceless and still she is traceless. But from the impugned order it appears that she died and her dead body has been disappeared. The petitioner is married daughter living in her Sasural.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11958 of 2018 (2) dt.27-02-2018 Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, let petitioner, namely, Kiran Kumari, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh, Patna in connection with Barh P.S. Case No.156 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Further condition is that the petitioner will participate in the proceeding whenever she will call by the agency. In failure to participate in the proceeding the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U T