Sudhir Das @ Sudhir Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5699 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -100 Year- 2017 Thana -HARLAKHI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Sudhir Das @ Sudhir Kumar Das S/o Yugeshwar Das, R/o VillageMahadevpatti, P.S.- Harlakhi, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-02-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Harlakhi P.S. Case No.100 of 2017 registered under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

Section 76(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 stipulates that all offences under this Act shall be cognizable and non-bailable. Its sub-section (2) stipulates that section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall not apply to the offences under the Excise Act.

Keeping in mind the allegations made in the F.I.R. and the statutory bar to grant of pre-arrest bail to those booked

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5699 of 2018 (2) dt.09-02-2018 2/2 under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, in my considered opinion, an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the present matter is not maintainable.

Thus, the petition is dismissed as not maintainable. In case the petitioner surrenders and seeks bail, the learned Special Judge shall be required to dispose of the same on merits taking into consideration the observations made by this Court in the matter of Ashok Sahani vs. State of Bihar [(2017) 3 PLJR 632].

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Kanchan/- U T