Pujo Yadav @ Pujba v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60994 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2022 Thana- ISMAILPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== PUJO YADAV @ PUJBA S/O BHOCHI YADAV R/O VILLAGETINTENGA KARARI, P.S- GOPALPUR, DISTT.- BHAGALPUR. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sharda Nand Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 15-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, some unknown miscreants came on motorcycle and overtook the informant's motorcycle and stopped their bike in front of his motorcycle. Thereafter, it is alleged that on the point of pistol they committed loot of samsung mobile phone, 3 bag containing document, Id card, visiting card and other articles.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. Petitioner is not named in the FIR and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60994 of 2023(2) dt.15-09-2023 2/2 the same has been lodged against unknown persons. The name of the petitioner has come into light, on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Sonu Yadav, which has got no evidentiary value in the eyes of law. On the basis of suspicion, he has implicated in the present case. Nothing incriminating/looted articles have been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. No T.I. Parade has been done. He is languishing in judicial custody since 04.05.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below in connection with Ismailpur P.S. Case No. 141 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) arish/- U