← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/8986/2015allowed

Dr. S.P. Singh Collage Of Teacher Education v. B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University And ORS

2016-03-03Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8986 of 2015 =========================================================== Dr. S.P. Singh College of Teacher Education, At Village- Laxmipur, P.O- Shankar Saraiya, City- Motihari, District- East Champaran, Bihar through the Secretary, Mr. Prakash Arun, Son of Dr. S.P. Singh, Raja Bazar, P.O.+P.S.- Motihari, DistrictEast Champaran, Bihar. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University at Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur through its Registrar.

2. The Vice Chancellor, B.R. Ambedkar BiharUniversity at Muzaffarpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

3. The Registrar, B.R. Ambedkar Bihar University at Muzaffarpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur.

4. National Assessment and Accreditation Council, P.O. Box No. 1075, Nagarbhavi, Bangalore-560072, Karnataka through its Director.

5. The Director, National Assesment and Accreditation Council, P.O. Box No.1075, Nagarbhavi, Bangalore-560072, Karnataka, India.

6. National Council for Teacher Education, (A Statutaory body of the Govt. of India) Hans Bhawan Wing II, Bhadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002 through its Member Secretary.

7. The Member Secretary, National Council for Teacher Education, Hans Bhawan Wing II, Bhadurshah Zafar Marg, New Delhi- 110002.

8. National Council for Teacher Education, Eastern Regional Committee, (A Statutory body of the Govt. of India), 15 Neelkantha Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubneshwar- 751012.

9. The Regional Directr, National Council for Teacher Education, Eastern Regional Committee, 15 Neelkantha Nagar, Nayapalli, Bhubneshwar- 751012. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the University :

Mr. Mrigank Mauli, Advocate For N.C.T.E.

:

Mr. S.N. Pathak, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-03-2016 Reason for the petitioner to file the writ application is that they require certification in a particular format for the purposes of consideration by NAAC and there is supposed to be a prescribed format in this regard which has been annexed as Annexure-7 to the

Patna High Court CWJC No.8986 of 2015 dt.03-03-2016 2 / 2 writ application.

However, for some strange reason, the University authorities are not willing to change the modality which they have adopted for issuance of such certificate, a copy of which is Annexure8. If changes have come about in the manner in which certain things are required to be done then the University must adopt such modality especially if they are statutory in nature. Writ application is disposed of with a direction upon the Registrar of the University that he will verify that Annexure-7 is the modal format for grant of certification for the purposes of utilization by NAAC and if it is so, the certificate in this regard will be issued within a period of six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this order.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) Sanjay/- U