Rajesh Kumar @ Flawer v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7401 of 2017 (2) dt.18-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.7401 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -145 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHESI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar @ Flawer, S/o Lakhindra Sah, Resident of VillageMahmada, P.S.- Mehshi, District- East Champaran..... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishore Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 18-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Mahesi P.S. Case No. 145 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, from possession of the petitioner and from his house several stolen mobiles and laptop were recovered. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner has been made victim of circumstances, he is suffering in custody since 03.09.2016, chargesheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence. Learned APP submits that considering the detention of the petitioner lenient view can be taken.
In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7401 of 2017 (2) dt.18-03-2017 above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Mehshi P.S. Case No. 145 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T