Yogendra Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1763 of 2016 ====================================================== Yogendra Prasad Singh, S/o Late Awadh Singh, resident of Village Nawagi Tola, P.O. Gurukul Mohiya, P.S. Chapra Muffasil, District- Saran at Chapra.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar (Through Dr. Dharmendra Singh the Secretary cum Commissioner, Human Resources Development, Patna, Bihar).
2. Kumar Binod Naryan Singh the Director High Education, Patna Bihar.
3. Deepak Anand the District Magistrate, Saran at Chapra.
4. Lalit Narayan Rajak the District Programme officer, Establishment, Saran at Chapra.
5. Chandra Kishore Prasad Yadav the District Education Officer, Saran at Chapra.
6. Krish Kumar Gupta the Management Committee of Mishri Lal Shah Aarya Kanya High School, Sahebganj, Chapra.
7. Anil Kumar Mishra the Principal Aarya Kanya High School, Saran. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Rajani Kumari For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 14-08-2018 Learned counsel for the State has pointed out from Annexure-A to the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party no.2 that the order dated 31.07.2015 passed in CWJC No.10495 of 2015 has already been complied with. This Court has gone through the documents available on the record. It appears that the Writ Court had given liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before the Director, Secondary Education who was directed to take a decision strictly in accordance with law keeping in view the power that has been
Patna High Court MJC No.1763 of 2016 (3) dt.14-08-2018 vested to him under Section 18 of the Secondary School Take Over Act, 1981. Annexure-A is the order which has been passed by the Director, Secondary Education.
This application has, thus, become infructuous and is disposed off accordingly giving liberty to the petitioner to seek his remedy, if so aggrieved by the order, as contained in Annexure-A, before the appropriate court in accordance with law. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U