Ravi Kumar Raja @ Raj Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No 18238 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -43 Year- 2017 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Ravi Kumar Raja @ Raj Sinha, S/o Sri Suman Kumar @ Suman Kumar Varma, Age 22 years, R/o Purani Jail, Ward No. 20, P.S. and District - Saharsa .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Ajit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr Kalyan Shankar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-04-2017 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Saharsa Police Station Case No 43 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 392 of Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is named in the first information report. It has been further subnmitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has been falsely implicated due to the statement of the co-accused and Rs 700/- has been recovered from his possession and he has been arrested from his house and now remained in custody for about two months. So far other criminal antecedent is concerned, it is submitted that he has been falsely implicated in thoses cases and on basis of those case, he has been made an accused in the present case also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18238 of 2017 (2) dt.25-04-2017 2/2 Heard learned APP also. Learned APP opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Police Station Case No 43 of 2017. With following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the Court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(iv) If he is named in future in such type of cases, his bail bond shall be cancelled. With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) M.E.H./- U T