Ram Pravesh Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56143 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-407 Year-2022 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Ram Pravesh Singh Son Of Late Kunj Bihari Singh R/O Village Mayapur Ps Daudnagar District Aurangabad 2.

Shashi Bhushan Kumar @ Shashi Bhushan Singh Son Of Ram Pravesh Singh R/O Village Mayapur Ps Daudnagar District Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Santosh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Harendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 18-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners have prayed for grant of bail in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 407 of 2022 registered under sections 341, 323, 307, 324, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently Section 302 of the IPC was added. As per allegation in the FIR, several accused persons including this petitioner with a view of kill Amrendra Singh, assaulted him, as a result of which he sustained head injury and fell down unconsciously. During course of treatment, he succumbed to injury.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner are innocent and have committed no offence due to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56143 of 2023(3) dt.18-09-2023 2/2 land dispute. They have falsely been implicated in this case. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioners and eight other persons. Nothing specific allegation has been levelled against these petitioners. Similarly situated other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court vide Annexure-2 series of the petition. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 21.06.2023. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of this case as well as the custody of the petitioners, the Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The above named petitioners are directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 407 of 2022 on each of them furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned S.D.J.M. Daudnagar, Aurangabad.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shubham/- U T