← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32986/2013dismissed

Ram Payare Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-08Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32986 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Ram Payare Chauhan, S/O- Late Buddhu Chauhan Resident of VillageDohra, Tola- Sirpatiya, P.S.- Nardiganj, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar Nawada, District- Nawada.

3. The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Nawada.

4. The Circle Officer, Nardiganj, District- Nawada.

5. Sarju Noniya @ Saryu Chauhan, S/O Late Nonia @ Latter Chauhan. Resident of Village- Dohra, Tola- Sirpatiya, P.S.- Nardiganj, DistrictNawada.

6. Yashoda Devi, W/O Buddhu Nonia, Resident of Village- Dohra, TolaSirpatiya, P.S.- Nardiganj, District-Nawada.

7. Chandra Nonia, S/O Late Thakuri Nonia Resident of Village- Dohra, Tola- Sirpatiya, P.S.- Nardiganj, District-Nawada. .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Anuj Kumar Srivastava(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 08-03-2016 Heard.

This application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. against the order dated 26.07.2012 in Case No. 542 of 2012, whereunder the S.D.M., Nawada initiated the proceeding under Section 144 Cr.P.C. to make the rule absolute against both parties in which the petitioner was the member of the second party.

The life span of order passed under Section 144 Cr.P.C. is only 60 days in the prohibiting in nature. As such, the life span of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32986 of 2013 (4) dt.08-03-2016 2/2 the impugned order has already been elapsed. Moreover, on going through the impugned order, I do not find any illegality amounting to abuse of process of Court for interference in jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Accordingly, this application is hereby dismissed.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.) manish/- U T