Ruby Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.40 of 2015 In LPA 1227 of 2013 ====================================================== Ruby Kumari. D/o Sri Ram Chandra Singh, Wife of Sri Avalok. Resident of village - Nardidih, P.O. and P.S.- Nardiganj, District - Newada, presently posted as Panchayat Teacher in Upgraded Middle School, Dariyapur, P.O. and P.S.- Nardiganj, District - Newada..

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through the Secretary-Cum-Commissioner, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director, Department of Human Resources, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The District Magistrate, Newada.

4.

The District Superintendent of Education, Nawada. 5.

The Block Development Officer, Nardiganj in the District of Nawada. 6.

The Block Education Extension Officer, Nardiganj in the District of Nawada.

7.

The Gram Panchayat, Nardiganj, through the Panchayat Secretary, under Nardiganj Block in the District of Nawada. 8.

The Mukhiya, Nardiganj, Gram Panchayat, Nardiganj, District - Nawada.

9.

The Member, District Teacher Employment Authority, Nawada.

10. Smt. Daizy Kumari. Wife of Manoj Kumar. Resident of Village - Patoria, P.O.- Adampur, P.S.- Katrisarai, District - Nawada, presently posted as Panchayat Teacher in Primary School, Nardidih, District - Nawada.

11. Smt. Usha Sinha. Wife of Dinesh Prasad Singh. Resident of village - Waksu, P.S.- Rajgir, District - Nalanda. (Petitioner in the Writ Petition). .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr.Sanjay Singh, Advocate, Mr. Navin Prasad Singh, Advocate and Mr. Narayan Singh, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ajay, GA12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE ) 28-04-2016 Heard Mr. Sanjay Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Ajay, learned Government Adovacate for the respondents.

Patna High Court C. REV. No.40 of 2015 (5) dt.28-04-2016 2/2 The petitioner prays to withdraw the application with liberty to file a writ petition or a suit for redressdal of her grievances.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the Civil Review is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a writ petition or a suit for redressal of his grievances.

(I.A. Ansari, ACJ) (Samarendra Pratap Singh, J) Shashi.

U