Satpal Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57145 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2022 Thana- BIRAUL District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1.

SATPAL MANJHI SON OF BUDESHWAR MANJHI R/O VILLAGEMANAR BHAURAM, P.S.- BIRAUL, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA 2.

NIKSON KUMAR MANJHI @ DHARMPAL MANJHI SON OF BUDESHWAR MANJHI R/O VILLAGE- MANAR BHAURAM, P.S.- BIRAUL, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA 3.

ABHISHEK KUMAR @ ABHISHEK MANJHI SON OF KAMAL NARAYAN R/O VILLAGE- MANAR BHAURAM, P.S.- BIRAUL, DISTRICT- DARBHANGA ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Girish Chandra Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for offence punishable u/s 143, 504, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379 of the IPC.

Allegedly, on account of some altercation, the accused persons named in F.I.R. including the petitioners abused and assaulted the informant and his family. Petitioner no.1 is said to have given iron rod blow on head of Sita Devi. Petitioner nos.2 & 3 assaulted Anila Devi and Kajal Devi, respectively. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57145 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. There is case and counter case between the parties. Though the allegation against petitioners is of assaulting the informant and his family by different means but as per the injury report, all the injuries are simple in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since the injuries are simple in nature, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Biraul P.S. Case No.45 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T