Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55181 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-12 Year-2023 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== PRINCE KUMAR son of Pramod Prasad Village- Shiv Kali Durga Mandir Road No- 13A New Bahadurpur Rajendranagar Ps- Bahadurpur Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Madhuri Lata, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 27-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 255, 260, 420, 465, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, petitioner is said to have used forged stamp in place of original stamp of Didarganj Police Station.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to high handedness of the police. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. Petitioner is an authorized recovery agent of M/s Amit Raj Consultancy Services Pvt. Ltd

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55181 of 2023(4) dt.27-02-2024 2/2 and no complaint was made against him by anyone ever before. It is further submitted that before recovery of the said vehicle, the petitioner obtained stamp from the police station, but the police in collusion with Ayodhya Singh, owner of Scorpio, implicated the petitioner in this false case. There is no evidence against the petitioner in the entire case diary. He has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is no specific overt act against the petitioner, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 12 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T