← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59250/2024bail granted

Rana Pratap Chauhan @ Rana Pratap @ Ram Pratap v. The State Of Bihar

2024-08-20Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59250 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-191 Year-2024 Thana- RAJPUR District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.

Rana Pratap Chauhan @ Rana Pratap @ Ram Pratap S/o Kanhaiya Lal Chauhan @ Kanhaiya Chauhan R/o vill - Hankarpur, P.S. - Rajpur, Distt. - Buxar 2.

Raja Babu Kumar Chauhan @ Rajababu Kumar @ Raja Babu Chauhan S/o Dhangi Chauhan R/o vill - Hankarpur, P.S. - Rajpur, Distt. - Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 27.48 litres of liquor from a ditch. It is next submitted that petitioners were not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and even alleged recovery is from a place which does not belong to the petitioners and is accessible to public at large and they came to be implicated at the instance of chowkidar. It is also submitted that police in majority of

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59250 of 2024(2) dt.20-08-2024 2/2 the cases implicates either at the instance of chowkidar, local person, secret information or confessional statement without holding proper investigation in a mechanical manner.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.500/- (Rupees five hundred) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Rajpur P.S. Case No.191/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioners shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioners and in the event if it is found that petitioners have antecedent of even one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T