Vijay Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65336 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2020 Thana- KACCHWA District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.

VIJAY KUMAR RAY Son of Late Surisht Ray @ Surishtha Prasaed Ray Resident of Village- Gujuru, P.S.- Kachhawa, District- Rohtas. 2.

Sujit Kumar Ray Son of Late Surisht Ray @ Surishtha Prasad Ray Resident of Village- Gujuru, P.S.- Kachhawa, District- Rohtas. 3.

Deepak Kumar Ray Son of Late Surisht Ray @ Surishtha Prasad Ray Resident of Village- Gujuru, P.S.- Kachhawa, District- Rohtas. 4.

Jitendra Kumar Ray Son of Ram Vishekh Ray Resident of Village- Gujuru, P.S.- Kachhawa, District- Rohtas.

5.

Ram Vishesh Ray @ Ram Vishekh Ray Son of Late Rajetal Ray @ Rajetar Ray Resident of Village- Gujuru, P.S.- Kachhawa, District- Rohtas. 6.

Madheshwar Ray Son of Late Rajetal Ray @ Rajetar Ray Resident of Village- Gujuru, P.S.- Kachhawa, District- Rohtas. 7.

Uday Ray @ Uday Kumar Ray Son of Shiv Bihari Ray Resident of VillageGujuru, P.S.- Kachhawa, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bharat Lal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 308, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of assault upon the informant due to which informant sustained injuries.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65336 of 2021(2) dt.13-07-2022 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the injuries are simple in nature and there is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-II, Bikramganj (Rohtas) in connection with Kachhawa P.S. Case No. 42 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T