Patna High CourtCWJC/8187/2015disposed

Rakesh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-08-01Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 8187 of 2015 =========================================================== Rakesh Kumar Sahu; S/o Late Baidyanath Sahu; Resident of Village Singhia; P.S. Singhia; District Samastipur; At Present Posted As In-charge Head Master Upgraded Middle School, Pabara, Singhia; P.S. Singhia; District Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Department of Education Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director Primary Education Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director Midday Meal Scheme Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

5. The District Education Officer, Samastipur.

6. The District Program Officer, Midday Meal Scheme, Samastipur.

7. The District Program Officer Establishment, Samastipur.

8. The Block Education Officer cum Drawing Disbursing Officer, Singhia. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, A.C. to S.C. 22 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 01-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

2. The petitioner has moved the Court for quashing of Memo No. 86 dated 15.01.2015 passed by the District Programme Officer, Midday Meal Scheme, Samastipur directing for recovery of Rs. 130498.00/- from the petitioner.

3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the writ petition be permitted to be withdrawn to move before the competent authority in the matter.

Patna High Court CWJC No.8187 of 2015 dt.01-08-2017 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the State does not oppose.

5. In view thereof, the writ petition stands disposed off with liberty aforesaid.

6. It is observed that if such representation is filed before the competent authority within three weeks from today along with a copy of this order, the same shall be heard and disposed off on merits within the next two months. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Anand Kr.

AFR/NAFR U