Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9855/2017bail granted

Md. Abid v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-01Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9855 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2016 Thana -KURSAKANTA District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Md. Abid, son of Md. Moharam, resident of village Haripur, P.S. Kuwari, District Araria .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 01-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Kursakanta (Kuwari) P.S.Case No. 200 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has clean antecedent but he has been made accused alleging that four litres of Nepali liquor has been recovered from his possession and he is in custody for more than two months. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent and has remained in custody for more than two months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9855 of 2017 (2) dt.01-03-2017 2/2 thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-IV, Araria, in connection with Kursakanta (Kuwari) P.S.Case No. 200 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move the cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U