Suresh Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.10562 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -218 Year- 2016 Thana -PAHARPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Suresh Manjhi, son of Jaipat Manjhi, resident of Village- Balua Ekwana, Police Station- Paharpur, District- East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
This is an application for bail in connection with Paharpur P.S.Case No. 218 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2016.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and remained in custody for about four months and the allegation is of recovery of eight litres of country made liquor.
Heard learned APP also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent and remained in custody for four months, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10562 of 2017 (2) dt.21-03-2017 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Paharpur P.S.Case No. 218 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U