Dr. Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54765 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-271 Year-2024 Thana- DUMRA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Dr. Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Son of Puran Rai R/o village- Mirchaiya, PsDumara, Dist- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Madhubala Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Pronoti Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 12-08-2025 Heard Ms.Madhubala Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms.Pronoti Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No. 271 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 19.06.2024 for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 110, 114, 115, 182, 194, 195, 201, 202, 203, 111, 120B and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. According to prosecution case, all the accused persons including the petitioner have participated in the cremation of Abhilasha Kumari (deceased) who was murdered by Raj Kumar Rai and they have concealed the facts about the aforesaid murder from the police.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

2/4 submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated. As per allegation in the FIR, the petitioner and other co-accused persons have concealed the facts in connection with Dumra P.S.Case No.372/2023 due to which the dead body of the deceased in connection with Dumra P.S.Case No.372/2023 was not recovered by the police and the petitioner and other co-accused persons have narrated the wrong story about Dumra P.S.Case No.372/2023 before the police. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in fact altogether more than 27 persons have participated in the cremation of the dead body of the deceased in Dumra P.S.Case No.372/2023 and petitioner is one of them and co-accused persons, namely, Puran Rai & Anr.

have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 20.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.26317 of 2025 and co-accused persons, namely, Ram Padarath Kumar and others have also been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 10.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.35037 of 2025 respectively.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts, petitioner has clean

3/4 antecedent and similarly situated co-accused persons, have been granted privilege of anticipatory bail by this Court, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in connection with Dumra P.S. Case No.

271 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure/Section 482(2) of BNSS,2023 and with other following conditions:- (I) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. (II) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(III) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his/her

4/4 criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T