Sintu Yadav @ Satyendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No 20050 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2015 Thana -LODIPUR District- BHAGALPUR ====================================================== Sintu Yadav @ Satyendra Yadav, S/o Suggan Yadav, Resident of VillageBabupur, P.S.- Sabaur, Distirct- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Pramod Kumar Singh, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-04-2017 Heard the parties.

Petitioner has earlier moved this Court and his prayer for bail was rejected vide order passed in Cr Misc No 5157 of 2017 with an observation that he may renew his prayer for bail before the Court concerned after submission of chargesheet. It has been submitted that now chargesheet has been submitted and the petitioner is in custody for about five months. Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bonds of Rs 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate IV,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20050 of 2017 (2) dt.26-04-2017 2/2 Bhagalpur in connection with Lodipur Police Station Case No 123 of 2015.

With following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the Court and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) M.E.H./- U T