Rajendra Singh @ Rajendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57930 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-469 Year-2022 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== 1.
Rajendra Singh @ Rajendra Prasad Son of Late Ganauri Ram @ Ganauri Singh village- Rajadih, Ps- Imamganj, Dist- Gaya 2.
Santosh singh @ Santosh Kumar son of Rajendra Singh @ Rajendra prasad village- Rajadih, Ps- Imamganj, Dist- Gaya 3.
Kanchan Devi Wife of Santosh singh @ Santosh Kumar village- Rajadih, Ps- Imamganj, Dist- Gaya 4.
Urmila Devi Wife of Ganauri Ram @ Ganauri Singh village- Rajadih, PsImamganj, Dist- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Ramadhar Singh son of Late Jagdish Singh Village- Dumari, Ps- Barachatti, Dist- Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.
2. Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 403/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegation against the petitioners is that they took cash amounting to Rs. 5,51,000/- as expenses from the complainant for marriage and when complainant went for Tilak
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57930 of 2024(2) dt.18-09-2024 2/3 ceremony, he found that the groom was exchanged with another boy.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. As a matter of fact, the negotiations of marriage of the daughter of complainant failed due to which this false and concocted case has been lodged. Complainant has not annexed any chit of paper in support of the allegation. He further submits that no offence is made under Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 403 of the Indian Penal Code is bailable. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the backdrop of the case, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest/surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sherghati, Gaya in connection with Complaint Case No. 469 of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57930 of 2024(2) dt.18-09-2024 3/3 Criminal Procedure.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T