Krishnmohan Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1855 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3601 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Krishnmohan Sah S/o-Gopal Sah Resident of Village-Chiutanan, P.O.- Ahiraulia, P.S.-Ramgarhawa, District-East Champaran. 2.

Ram Ekbal Prasad S/o Late Shivnath Prasad Resident of Village-Chiutanan, P.O.-Ahiraulia, P.S.-Ramgarhawa, District-East Champaran. 3.

Keshu Sah S/o Late Bhikhari Sah Resident of Village-Chiutanan, P.O.- Ahiraulia, P.S.-Ramgarhawa, District-East Champaran. 4.

Shatrudhan Prasad S/o Late Shivdani Sah Resident of Village-Chiutanan, P.O.-Ahiraulia, P.S.-Ramgarhawa, District-East Champaran. 5.

Jeetendra Singh S/o Late Lal Prasad Singh Resident of Village-Chiutanan, P.O.-Ahiraulia, P.S.-Ramgarhawa, District-East Champaran. 6.

Bhulawan Sah S/o Vaidhayanath Sah Resident of Village-Chiutanan, P.O.- Ahiraulia, P.S.-Ramgarhawa, District-East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar.

2.

The Collector-Cum-District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari. 3.

The Superintendent of Police, East Champaran, Motihari. 4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, East Champaran, Motihari. 5.

The Block Development Officer, Block-Ramgarhawa, East Champaran, Motihari.

6.

The Circle Officer, Block-Ramgarhawa, East Champaran, Motihari. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajeev Kumar Singh, Addvocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Raj Kishore Roy (GP18) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 28-09-2022 Though the present petition has been brought under the heading "For Orders (on Office Notes)", however, since the present petition pertains to restoration of a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. no. 3601 of 2018, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution, this Court deems it fit and appropriate to ignore

Patna High Court MJC No.1855 of 2022(2) dt.28-09-2022 2/2 the defects and proceed to hear the matter on merits. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that on account of inadvertence, the learned counsel for the petitioners could not appear before this Court when the aforesaid writ petition was called out for hearing, hence the said omission be condoned and the writ petition be restored to its original file.

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and appropriate to direct for restoration of the aforesaid writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. no. 3601 of 2018, to its original file. The present petition stands allowed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U