← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./54315/2025bail granted

Raghuvendra Rana @ Ravindra Rana @ Piyush v. The State Of Bihar

2025-08-18Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54315 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-229 Year-2025 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas ====================================================== Raghuvendra Rana @ Ravindra Rana @ Piyush S/O Rajiv Ranjan @ Rajeev Ranjan R/O Near Baudhi House, Ward No-18, P.S- Dehri Town, DisttRohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Himanshu Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Dehri Town P.S. Case No. 229/2025 dated 17.05.2025 registered for the offence punishable u/s 87 of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is alleged to have abducted the daughter of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There was love affair between the petitioner and the victim. There is nothing on record which shows that the victim was forced or seduced to have illicit intercourse with another

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54315 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 2/2 person. The victim in her statement recorded u/s 180 and 183 of the B.N.S.S. has stated that she went with the petitioner to Varanasi via Kudra and returned to Kudra from Varanasi. Learned counsel has submitted that the victim has not raised any alarm while being taken to Varanasi. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 19.05.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Dehri (Rohtas) in connection with Dehri Town P.S. Case No. 229/2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T