Bablu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23230 of 2017 (3) dt.29-06-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.23230 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -23 Year- 2017 Thana -SHEKHPURA District- SEKHPURA ====================================================== Bablu Singh Son of Chandra Deo Singh, Resident of Village- Khautha, P.S.- Barahaiya, District- Lakhisarai.

... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Sahay Jamuar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 29-06-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sheikhpura P.S. Case No. 23 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26(ii)/35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, five persons were apprehended when they have assembled to commit crime and from possession of the petitioner two live cartridges were recovered.

Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 24.01.2017, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession, other co-accused Indal Yadav and Chandan Kumar have been allowed bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 19377 of 2017 and 22324 of 2017 by other co-ordinate Benches of this Court and as such the petitioner also deserves sympathetic consideration.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23230 of 2017 (3) dt.29-06-2017 Learned APP does not oppose the aforesaid contention. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhpura (Kusumbha) P.S. Case No. 23 of 2017, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T