← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./67644/2019dismissed

Raushan Raut v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-19Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67644 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-162 Year-2017 Thana- RAXAUL District- East Champaran ====================================================== RAUSHAN RAUT Son of Bharat Raut Resident of Village - Bhisha Ward NH- 8, P.S. - Birganj, District - Parsa (Nepal). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anuj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2020 Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case No. 50 of 2017 arising out of Raxaul P.S. Case No. 162 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 20, 22, 23 and 24 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 09.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 49024 of 2017 and there is recovery of 6 Kg. of Charas from the petitioner.

The ground for bail is that the petitioner is in custody for almost 2 and 1⁄2 years.

Heard learned A.P.P. and perused the report called for from the learned trial court from which it appears that out of 6 charge-sheeted witnesses 5 have been examined and learned trial court has assailed that the trial is likely to be concluded.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67644 of 2019(4) dt.19-02-2020 2/2 In view of the facts as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner but the custody of the petitioner is so long the learned trial court is directed to conclude the trial preferably within a period of six months.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Rahul/ved U T