Bimal Kumar Azad @ Vimal Kumar Azad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4104 of 2015 ====================================================== Bimal Kumar Azad @ Vimal Kumar Azad Son of Late Lameshwari Prasad Yadav, resident of Village + P.O. - Shankarpur, Police Station - Muffasil, District- Munger.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Department of Labour Resources, New Secretariat, Baily Road, Patna.

2. The Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Bhagalpur.

3. Indian Tobacco Company Ltd. (ITC Ltd.) At Basudeopur, District - Munger, through its Management.

.... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Kumar Priyaranjan, Advocate For the Respondent No.3 : Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12 04-08-2017 This case has been adjourned on more than one and a half dozen times on one ground or another on behalf of the petitioner. Even today, when the matter has been taken up, the Advocate-on-record did not turn up. A prayer has been made by one Mr. Neeraj Kumar, learned Advocate to adjourn the case for a week.

Looking at the manner in which the case has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.4104 of 2015 (12) dt.04-08-2017 2 / 2 conducted in past, the prayer is refused.

Mr. Neeraj Kumar, learned Advocate has declined to argue the case and submitted that he has no instruction to argue the case on merit.

Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no.3 are present.

In that view of the matter, the application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T