Shyam Sunder Rishidev v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 55729 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-108 Year-2022 Thana- KOCHADHAMAN District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Shyam Sunder Rishidev, aged about 46 years, Male Son of Lakhan Rishidev @ Lakhan Rishi Resident of Village- Lalkaniya Lalsona, P.S.- Kochadhaman, District- Kishanganj.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Tarun Prasad Mandal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 09-12-2022 The matter has been heard through video conferencing.
2. Heard Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, learned Additional Public Prosecutor (hereinafter referred to as the 'APP') for the State.
3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kochadhaman PS Case No. 108 of 2022 dated 01.05.2022, instituted under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. The allegation against the petitioner is that he had killed his wife and tried to destroy the evidence.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55729 of 2022 dt.09-12-2022 2/2
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the couple were married for 15 years and there was no occasion for him to kill the wife. It was submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 09.05.2022.
6. Learned APP submitted that in the FIR itself, it has come that the petitioner had two wives and the deceased used to be beaten up by the petitioner and the other wife. Further, it was submitted that the postmortem reveals that the deceased was strangulated to death.
7. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the evidence which has come during investigation, the Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
8. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J) P. Kumar AFR/NAFR U T